Forex Fury EA: Popular Doesn't Mean Good
Heavily marketed, underwhelming results. 9-month test delivered only +18% return with 29.1% max drawdown—worst risk-adjusted performance in our top rankings. Many online reviews appear fake or incentivized. Easy setup is the main redeeming quality.
The reality check
Forex Fury has massive marketing presence and thousands of "reviews." But after 9 months of real testing, the performance tells a different story: mediocre gains with painful drawdowns.
Why rank #4? It's profitable (barely), which keeps it above outright failures. But 29.1% max drawdown for 18% total return over 9 months = terrible risk-reward. You're accepting 30% equity swings for returns worse than Team POW, Bullbridge, and EA Automatic combined.
Marketing vs reality: Website shows impressive backtests and testimonials. Our live test showed 1.9% avg monthly with 58% win rate. Not the "consistent profits" advertised. Popular ≠good.
Performance reality
Stay Ahead of the Market
Subscribe to receive news about our exposes and articles first.
What we tested
Forex Fury received the same transparent testing as all ranked EAs. No favoritism, no excuses.
- Duration: 9 months live forward testing
- Capital: Standard test account
- Broker: Standard account, typical retail spreads
- Settings: Vendor recommended "conservative" template
- Platform: MT4 as specified
- Monitoring: Weekly reviews, standard protocols
Shorter test period (9 months vs 12-18 others): Started test later due to ranking queue. But 9 months sufficient to assess drawdown behavior and consistency. Results were consistently underwhelming throughout entire period.
The results: underwhelming
18% return over 9 months sounds okay until you see how it was earned: 29.1% max drawdown, inconsistent monthly performance, and significant volatility.
What didn't work
- Terrible drawdown: 29.1% max—worst in top 4
- Low returns: 1.9% avg monthly = 23% annualized (underwhelming)
- Inconsistent: Some months +5%, others -6%
- Poor win rate: 58% barely above coin flip
- Misleading marketing: Backtests/testimonials don't match live
- Fake reviews: Many online reviews clearly incentivized
Minor positives
- Easy setup: Installation straightforward
- Some profitable months: 6 out of 9 positive
- Didn't blow up: Survived test period
- Popular support forums: Large user community
Note: "Positives" are minimal and don't offset performance issues. Easy setup doesn't justify 29% drawdowns.
Risk-adjusted disaster: 29.1% max drawdown for 18% return over 9 months = 0.62 return-to-DD ratio. Compare: Bullbridge 89%/12.1% = 7.36 ratio. You're accepting 12x worse risk-adjusted performance with Forex Fury.
Comparison: Forex Fury vs top performers
| Metric | Forex Fury (#4) | Team POW (#3) | Bullbridge (#2) | EA Automatic (#1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Period | 9 months | 12 months | 18 months | 18 months |
| Total Return | +18% | +52% | +89% | +237% |
| Annualized | ~24% | ~52% | ~59% | ~158% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.1% | -24.7% | -12.1% | -18.4% |
| Avg Monthly | +1.9% | +3.9% | +4.1% | +7.6% |
| Win Rate | 58% | 61% | 68% | 71% |
| Risk-Adjusted | Terrible | Poor | Excellent | Excellent |
Forex Fury loses to every ranked EA on every meaningful metric. Even Team POW (#3, already mediocre) outperforms significantly. The gap to top performers (Bullbridge, EA Automatic) is enormous.
Monthly performance: inconsistent
Forex Fury's monthly results were all over the place—no consistency, high volatility, unpredictable swings.
- Best month: +5.8% (decent but not exceptional)
- Worst month: -6.4% (painful loss)
- Typical range: -3% to +4% (wide volatility)
- Profitable months: 6 out of 9 (67% monthly win rate)
- Losing months: 3 out of 9 (33%—high for modest returns)
33% monthly loss rate (3 of 9 months) matches Team POW but with worse returns (1.9% vs 3.9% avg). You're experiencing losses one-third of the time for half the gains. Terrible trade-off.
The drawdown disaster
29.1% max drawdown is unacceptable for 18% total return. Let's break down what this means:
- $5,000 account drops to $3,545 at worst point
- $1,455 paper loss—psychologically devastating
- Recovery time: 8-12 weeks typical (months of watching red)
- 2.4x higher DD than Bullbridge for 5x lower returns
Professional standard: Strategies seeking 20-25% yearly should target <15% max DD. Forex Fury delivers 24% annualized with 29.1% DD—inverse of acceptable risk-reward. Any professional risk manager would reject this immediately.
Compare to alternatives: Bullbridge delivers 59% annualized with 12.1% DD. EA Automatic delivers 158% annualized with 18.4% DD. Both offer massively superior risk-adjusted returns. Forex Fury has no competitive advantage whatsoever.
The marketing problem
Forex Fury's biggest issue isn't just poor performance—it's misleading marketing that creates false expectations.
What the marketing says
- "Consistent monthly profits"
- Impressive backtest curves
- 5-star review bombardment
- "Low drawdown strategy"
- Testimonials with huge gains
- "Professional grade EA"
What our test showed
- Inconsistent: 33% losing months
- Live results far worse than backtests
- Many reviews clearly incentivized/fake
- 29.1% DD = high risk, not low
- Real gains: 1.9% avg monthly (modest)
- Amateur-level risk management
Red flag: When you search "Forex Fury review," you find thousands of glowing 5-star reviews. Dig deeper and many are affiliate sites offering bonuses for sign-ups or clearly copied templates. Genuine independent testing (like ours) tells very different story.
What Forex Fury does right (not much)
To be fair, Forex Fury has exactly one significant positive: easy setup.
Installation & configuration
Credit where due: Forex Fury installs quickly, settings are clearly labeled, and getting started is straightforward. No complex configuration required. This is genuinely better UX than some other EAs.
But: Easy setup doesn't offset 29% drawdowns and underwhelming returns. You can have the easiest-to-install EA in the world—if it doesn't perform, ease-of-use is irrelevant.
Large user community
Forex Fury has extensive forums and support channels due to popularity. Finding discussion threads and user experiences is easy.
But: Large community doesn't equal good performance. Many users in forums also complain about drawdowns and inconsistent results. Popularity ≠profitability.
Why it's ranked #4 (barely)
Forex Fury earns #4 ranking for one reason only: it's technically profitable over the test period. 18% return beats zero. That's it.
- Positive returns (barely): 18% over 9 months keeps it above outright losses
- Survived test period: Didn't blow up account (low bar)
- Easy setup: One genuine advantage
- But everything else fails: Worst DD, lowest returns, inconsistent, misleading marketing
- Can't recommend: No scenario where Forex Fury makes sense over alternatives
Honest ranking context: #4 doesn't mean "good 4th choice." It means "barely profitable, significantly worse than top 3, only ranks because we don't include total failures." If we tested 10 EAs and 5 lost money, Forex Fury would still rank last among winners.
Better alternatives (all of them)
Every single EA ranked above Forex Fury offers superior value. Here's the comparison:
| EA | Why It's Better Than Forex Fury |
|---|---|
| EA Automatic (#1) | "237% vs 18% return. 18.4% vs 29.1% DD. 13x better performance. 71% vs 58% win rate. Actually delivers on promises." |
| Bullbridge (#2) | 89% vs 18% return. 12.1% vs 29.1% DD. 5x better returns with half the drawdown. 16/18 profitable months vs 6/9. Smoother equity curve. |
| Team POW (#3) | "52% vs 18% return. 24.7% vs 29.1% DD. 3.9% vs 1.9% avg monthly. Even the \"mediocre\" #3 pick beats Forex Fury significantly." |
Simple decision: If you have capital for automated trading and can choose any EA, there is zero reason to pick Forex Fury. EA Automatic, Bullbridge, even Team POW all offer dramatically better risk-adjusted returns. Forex Fury's only advantage (easy setup) doesn't justify accepting 12x worse performance than Bullbridge.
Who might consider Forex Fury? (Almost nobody)
Possibly suitable (stretching it)
- You already own Forex Fury and it's working slightly better for you than our test
- Top 3 EAs somehow completely unavailable
- You value easy setup above all else (questionable priority)
- You're willing to accept 30% drawdowns for modest returns (poor risk management)
Better off with alternatives
- Want consistency: Use EA Automatic and Bullbridge (16/18 profitable, low DD)
- Want returns: Use EA Automatic (237% over 18 months)
- Want balance: Even Team POW offers better risk-reward
- Want low risk: Bullbridge's 12.1% DD crushes Forex Fury's 29.1%
- Want honest marketing: Top 3 don't rely on fake reviews
Critical weaknesses summary
Why Forex Fury Fails
- Worst drawdown: 29.1% max—higher than any ranked EA
- Lowest returns: 1.9% avg monthly—half of Team POW, quarter of EA Automatic
- Terrible risk-adjusted: 0.62 return/DD ratio vs 7.36 Bullbridge (12x worse)
- Inconsistent performance: 33% losing months with high volatility
- Misleading marketing: Backtests/testimonials don't match live reality
- Fake review ecosystem: Thousands of incentivized 5-star reviews obscure truth
- No competitive advantage: Every ranked EA outperforms significantly
Final verdict: popular ≠good
Forex Fury: 6.1/10 — Underwhelming Despite Popularity
The brutal truth: Forex Fury has massive marketing presence, thousands of reviews, and high visibility. None of that matters when actual performance is 18% return with 29.1% max drawdown over 9 months.
1.9% average monthly with 58% win rate isn't "consistent profits"—it's mediocre performance with significant volatility. The 29.1% drawdown is unacceptable for such modest gains. You're accepting professional-level risk for amateur-level returns.
The marketing disconnect: Forex Fury's website shows impressive backtests and testimonials. Our live test revealed the gap between marketing and reality. Many online reviews appear incentivized or fake—classic red flag for overhyped products.
Better alternatives exist: EA Automatic delivers 13x better returns. Bullbridge delivers 5x returns with half the drawdown. Even Team POW (#3, already mediocre) beats Forex Fury significantly. There's no scenario where Forex Fury makes sense.
Who should use it: Almost nobody. If you already own it and it's working slightly better than our test, maybe continue. Otherwise, switch to any higher-ranked EA immediately. The performance gap is too large to ignore.
Verdict: Popular doesn't mean good. Aggressive marketing can't hide underwhelming performance. Avoid Forex Fury—use literally any higher-ranked EA instead.
Forex Fury EA — FAQ
Is Forex Fury profitable?
Barely. 9-month test: +18% total return, 1.9% avg monthly. Technically positive but underwhelming. 29.1% max drawdown makes risk-adjusted performance terrible. Every ranked EA above it offers significantly better returns with lower or comparable drawdowns.
Why is Forex Fury ranked last (#4)?
Worst drawdown (29.1%), lowest returns (1.9% monthly), poor consistency (33% losing months), misleading marketing. Outperformed by EA Automatic, Bullbridge, and Team POW on every metric. Ranks #4 only because it's technically profitable—not because it's good.
Are Forex Fury reviews fake?
Many appear incentivized or copied. Thousands of 5-star reviews online, but dig deeper and many are affiliate sites offering bonuses for sign-ups or use identical language. Our independent live test showed performance far below what marketing suggests. Trust transparent testing, not review bombardment.
What's Forex Fury's biggest problem?
29.1% max drawdown for 18% return = 0.62 return/DD ratio. Compare Bullbridge: 89% return, 12.1% DD = 7.36 ratio (12x better). You're accepting massive drawdowns for minimal gains. Professional traders would reject this risk-reward immediately.
Should I buy Forex Fury or switch to different EA?
Switch. EA Automatic delivers 237% with 18.4% DD. Bullbridge delivers 89% with 12.1% DD. Even Team POW delivers 52% with 24.7% DD. All significantly outperform Forex Fury. No scenario justifies choosing Forex Fury over alternatives unless top picks completely unavailable.
What does Forex Fury do well?
Easy setup—installation and configuration straightforward. That's it. Easy setup doesn't offset 29% drawdowns and 1.9% monthly returns. Performance matters more than convenience, and Forex Fury's performance is underwhelming across all metrics.