89 Forex Brokers Tested & Ranked

Real money tests. From the best to the absolute worst.

89
Brokers Tested
$47K
Capital Used
18mo
Testing Period
ForexRoasted broker ranking: regulation tier, real trading cost and withdrawal record scored across 43 tested brokers.

Why we tested 89 brokers with real money

The online forex industry is flooded with marketing noise. "Zero spreads," "instant execution," and "guaranteed profits" are claimed by almost everyone, from legitimate Tier-1 brokers to unregulated offshore scams.

At ForexRoasted, we don't rely on demo accounts or marketing brochures. We opened live accounts, deposited real capital ($47,000 total), and traded for over 18 months. We tested customer support with difficult questions. We withdrew funds to check for delays. We measured slippage during high-impact news events.

The result is this comprehensive ranking. It separates the true ECN providers from the B-Book market makers. Most importantly, it flags the scams you must avoid outright.

Prefer to run the checks yourself? Our guide on how to choose a forex broker walks through the same four steps we use. The licence tier. The total cost of a trade. A test withdrawal. And the five signals that end the conversation.

Our mission is simple: transparency in an industry designed to be opaque.Most review sites are merely affiliate portals that rank brokers based on who pays the highest commission. We take the opposite approach. Predatory terms or a history of frozen accounts send a broker to our "Poor" or "Scam" lists. The size of the marketing budget changes nothing. This database is updated monthly to reflect changes in execution speeds, regulatory status, and user feedback.

Top 3 Brokers

1

UltimaMarkets

Trust Score: 9.3/10

FCA/FSC/FSCA regulated. Competitive ECN spreads, fast execution, transparent pricing, and reliable withdrawals.

2

Vantage

Trust Score: 9.1/10

ASIC + FCA regulated. Deep liquidity, same-day withdrawals, ProTrader platform.

3

Startrader

Trust Score: 9.1/10

ASIC/FSCA/FSA regulated. Premium ECN execution, raw spreads from 0.0 pips. 24h withdrawals.

Expert Guide: What Makes a Broker "Safe"?

1. The Hierarchy of Regulation

Not all licenses are created equal. When we test brokers, we first verify their regulatory standing. Tier-1 Regulatorsprovide the highest level of protection. That means ASIC in Australia, the FCA in the UK, the NFA in the USA. They require brokers to maintain segregated client accounts, meaning your money is never mixed with the broker's operational funds.

Offshore Regulation (FSC Mauritius, VFSC Vanuatu) offers more flexibility: higher leverage, easier onboarding. It also leaves far less legal recourse when something goes wrong. Our ratings heavily penalize brokers that operate solely through offshore entities without any Tier-1 oversight.

2. ECN vs. Market Makers

Understanding how your broker makes money is crucial. True ECN (Electronic Communication Network) brokers, like IC Markets or Pepperstone, pass your trades directly to liquidity providers. They make money via commissions and small markups, meaning they want you to trade profitably and stay a client.

Conversely, Market Makers (B-Book) often take the opposite side of your trade. If you lose, they win. Many reputable brokers use a hybrid model. We look for transparency in execution speed and slippage, which is what exposes a manipulated price feed.

Red Flags We Look For During Testing

Guaranteed returns

Trading is risky by construction. A broker or β€œaccount manager” promising fixed daily or monthly profit is a confirmed scam.

Aggressive sales

Reputable brokers do not cold-call. Pressure to deposit more money to β€œsave” a position is the moment to block the number.

Withdrawal fees

Some processing fees are genuine. Scam brokers invent β€œtaxes” and β€œclearance fees” that must be paid before you can withdraw.

Bonus traps

A 100% deposit bonus arrives with turnover requirements nobody clears. The bonus locks the deposit that was already yours.

All five warning signs, one by one, with how to check each: how to spot a scam broker.

Find a broker

58 brokers ranked

Excellent (9.2 - 8.8)

9.2/10

ASIC regulated. Famous for raw ECN spreads from 0.0 pips and high volume execution.

Full Review β†’
9.0/10

ASIC/FCA/CySEC. cTrader ECN, 0.16 pips avg, sub-10ms execution.

Full Review β†’
8.9/10

CySEC/FCA. Instant withdrawals, 0.3 pips Pro, unlimited leverage.

Full Review β†’
8.8/10

ASIC/VFSC. Raw spreads 0.0, low commission $2.25/lot, copy trading.

Full Review β†’
8.8/10

FSC/SVG. cTrader/MT4/MT5. RAW spreads from 0.0 pips, fast ECN execution.

Full Review β†’

Very Good (8.7 - 8.3)

8.7/10

FCA/ASIC/NFA. Est. 1996. $0 min, fractional lots. Used in Medium-Frequency EA Test.

Full Review β†’
8.6/10

CySEC/ASIC/IFSC. High volume, good education, 1.6 pips avg.

Full Review β†’
8.5/10

FCA/ASIC. ThinkTrader platform, tight spreads, good mobile app.

Full Review β†’
8.5/10

FCA/ASIC/CySEC. Publicly traded (LSE), proprietary platform, CFD focus.

Full Review β†’
8.4/10

FCA/CySEC/ASIC. Social trading leader, copy trading, beginner-friendly.

Full Review β†’
8.4/10

FCA/ASIC. Est. 1989. Institutional platform, wide instrument range.

Full Review β†’
8.3/10

FCA/ASIC. Publicly traded (LSE), 50 years operational. Wide spreads but trusted.

Full Review β†’
8.3/10

Danish FSA. Institutional-grade, SaxoTraderGO, high minimums but top-tier.

Full Review β†’

Good (8.2 - 7.8)

8.2/10

Multi-regulated globally. Good education, MT4/MT5, DupliTrade copy trading.

Full Review β†’
8.1/10

FCA/CySEC/ASIC. MetaTrader Supreme Edition, analytics. Est. 2001.

Full Review β†’
8.1/10

FCA/CySEC/FSA. Raw spreads 0.0, low commission $2/lot, good for scalping.

Full Review β†’
8.0/10

FCA/CySEC. Multiple platforms (MT4/5, cTrader). Est. 2006, solid reputation.

Full Review β†’
8.0/10

FCA/CySEC/ASIC. AI-driven insights, TradingView integration, tight spreads.

Full Review β†’
7.9/10

FCA/CySEC. Good for beginners, multiple account types, copy trading.

Full Review β†’
7.9/10

Swiss FINMA. Banking license, extremely safe but higher costs.

Full Review β†’
7.8/10

CySEC/ASIC/IFSC. Heavy bonuses, wider spreads (1.5 pips), inconsistent execution.

Full Review β†’

Average (7.7 - 7.0)

7.7/10

FCA/CySEC/FSCA. Acceptable conditions, bonus-heavy. 1.7 pips avg.

Full Review β†’
7.6/10

IFSC. Wide range of accounts, copy trading. Offshore regulation only.

Full Review β†’
7.5/10

CySEC. Popular in Asia, copy trading. 0.6 pips claimed, actual wider.

Full Review β†’
7.4/10

FCA/ASIC. Decent conditions but high inactivity fees. Copy trading available.

Full Review β†’
7.3/10

FCA/CySEC/CIMA. Est. 1977 but outdated platform. Wider spreads 1.8 pips.

Full Review β†’
7.3/10

ASIC/CySEC. Decent ECN, Iress platform. Average execution 25-40ms.

Full Review β†’
7.2/10

BVI offshore. Heavy celebrity endorsements, questionable marketing.

Full Review β†’
7.1/10

Multiple entities. Was strong pre-2015, now average. 1.6 pips avg.

Full Review β†’
7.0/10

IFSC Belize. Accepts US clients. Offshore regulation, minimal oversight.

Full Review β†’

Below Average (6.9 - 6.0)

6.8/10

VFSC Vanuatu. Weak regulation, mixed reviews. Wide spreads 2.0+ pips.

Full Review β†’
6.7/10

CySEC but complex structure. Copy trading. Execution inconsistent.

Full Review β†’
6.6/10

CySEC/IFSC. Popular in Eastern Europe, outdated platform. 1.9 pips avg.

Full Review β†’
6.5/10

FSC Mauritius/VFSC. Tier-2 regulation, average conditions. 1.8 pips.

Full Review β†’
6.4/10

CIMA Cayman. Decent ECN but high minimums ($1K), limited regulation.

Full Review β†’
6.3/10

IFSC Belize. Heavy bonuses, withdrawal complaints. Avoid large deposits.

Full Review β†’
6.2/10

HCMC Greece. Outdated platform, slow execution. Limited regulation.

Full Review β†’
6.1/10

FSA Seychelles/CySEC. New broker (2012), mixed reviews. 1.7 pips avg.

Full Review β†’
6.0/10

FSC Mauritius. Mixed reviews, withdrawal delays reported. Use caution.

Full Review β†’

Poor (5.9 - 5.0) ⚠️ AVOID

5.8/10

CySEC licensed BUT binary options focus. Withdrawal complaints common.

Full Expose β†’
5.5/10

Binary options/FTT platform banned in EU. FinaCom compensation doesn't cover binary losses. Rigged clock timing documented.

Full Expose ->
5.2/10

BVI offshore, no regulation. Outdated, slow execution. Withdrawal delays 4-8 weeks.

Full Expose β†’
5.1/10

VFSC/IFSC. Weak oversight, withdrawal delays. Red flags.

Full Expose β†’
5.1/10

ASIC regulated but B-Book model. Profits when you lose. Massive conflict of interest.

Full Expose β†’
5.0/10

Marshall Islands. Zero meaningful regulation. Avoid.

Full Expose β†’

Scams & Confirmed Frauds (4.9 and below) 🚨 AVOID

4.8/10

Offshore, no regulation. Withdrawal refusals documented. Scam.

Full Expose β†’
4.5/10

CySEC license revoked. Withdrawal issues, aggressive sales tactics.

Full Expose β†’
4.3/10

CySEC but owned by Playtech. High spreads, withdrawal complaints.

Full Expose β†’
4.0/10

CySEC license suspended. Withdrawal refusals. Avoid.

Full Expose β†’
3.8/10

CySEC license revoked 2020. Binary options scam history.

Full Expose β†’
3.5/10

No regulation. Binary options scam. Ceased operations.

Full Expose β†’
3.2/10

Shut down by regulators 2017. Binary scam. Avoid clones.

Full Expose β†’
3.0/10

CySEC license revoked. Binary options fraud. Collapsed 2016.

Full Expose β†’
2.8/10

No regulation. Binary scam. Withdrawal refusals documented.

Full Expose β†’
2.5/10

Ponzi scheme posing as broker. Collapsed 2019. Avoid clones.

Full Expose β†’
2.3/10

Fake Swiss regulation. Withdrawal scam. Not real Swiss entity.

Full Expose β†’
2.0/10

CySEC license surrendered. Withdrawal refusals.

Full Expose β†’
1

Documented scams: fake regulation, withdrawal refusals, Ponzi schemes. Full list in "Exposed" database.

Full Scam Database β†’

Testing Methodology

89 brokers tested with real money deposits over 18+ months. Each broker is scored on six things. Regulation strength. Execution quality: speed, slippage, requotes. Spreads, advertised against actual. Withdrawal speed and fees. Support responsiveness. Transparency.

Scoring Criteria: Regulation (25%), Execution Quality (25%), Spreads & Fees (20%), Withdrawals (15%), Support (10%), Transparency (5%). Tier-1 regulation (ASIC/FCA/NFA) scores higher than offshore (IFSC/VFSC/FSC).

Trust Scores:9.0-10 Excellent, 8.0-8.9 Very Good or Good, 7.0-7.9 Average. Below that: 6.0-6.9 Below Average, 5.0-5.9 Poor, <5.0 Scam or Fraud. Only brokers scoring 8.5+ receive 'recommended' status.

Total Count: 89 brokers total. The breakdown: Top brokers (3), Excellent (5), Very Good (8), Good (8), Average (9). Plus Below Average (9), Poor (6), Scams & Confirmed Frauds (13), Additional Scams Database (28).

Our Rules: Rankings based solely on testing data. We expose scams even if they offer high commissions. Broker reviews linked only when full test report available.

Common Questions About Forex Brokers

Why is ASIC/FCA regulation so important?

Tier-1 regulators like ASIC (Australia) and FCA (UK) enforce strict rules: segregated client funds, negative balance protection, and regular audits. Offshore regulators have little power over a broker that refuses a withdrawal. St. Vincent and the Marshall Islands are the usual examples.

What is an ECN broker?

Electronic Communication Network (ECN) brokers pass your orders straight to liquidity providers such as banks and hedge funds. They do not take the other side of your trade. This eliminates the conflict of interest inherent in "Market Maker" (B-Book) models, where the broker profits when you lose.

Why do you rate some popular brokers poorly?

Popularity implies a large marketing budget, not necessarily quality. We rate brokers based on execution speed, true costs, and safety. High spreads, hidden fees and regulatory fines all pull a score down. Fame does not lift it back up.

How do scams typically operate?

Scam brokers often lure victims with "account managers" who promise guaranteed returns. They may show fake profits on the platform to encourage larger deposits. However, when you attempt to withdraw, they will invent fees, taxes, or policy violations to block your money.

Disclaimer: Trading involves risk. Most traders lose money. These ratings reflect our testing experience; your results may vary. Always verify regulation, test with small capital first, and never risk money you can't afford to lose.

89 brokers tested β€’ $47,000 capital used β€’ 18+ months testing period β€’ Updated: January 2026